United States v. Glenn-Colusa Irrigation District

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indicating federal common law, rather than state law regarding tort principles applies to Section 9 claims
• rejecting construction of NEPA “in which any decision of a law enforcement agency— whether to go forward with an action or forbear from action—would require a NEPA analysis”
• \It is doubtful that Congress intended that the Endangered Species Act would apply differently in different states depending on state law definitions of proximate cause.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).