United States v. Glen Mark, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that no error occurs if a trial court “fail[s] to give a limiting instruction for a defendant where one was never requested,” even in situations where such an instruction is warranted
• holding that no error occurs if a trial court “fail[s] to give a limiting instruction for a defendant where one was never requested,” even in situations where such an instruction is warranted
• explaining that \a defen- dant’s knowledge and intent are clearly elements which the prosecu- tion must establish to prove a [narcotics] conspiracy\
• “[T]he relevance of the evidence derives from the defendant’s having possessed the same state of mind in the commission of both the extrinsic act and the charged offense.” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).