United States v. Gioeli, Saracino

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the 5 “participation of additional people in the murder [wa]s not inconsistent with the government’s 6 account of the . . . murder”
• “We decline to reach this constitutional question, however, because assuming arguendo that there was a constitutional violation, [it was] harmless.”
• “A sentencing court is entitled to rely on any type of information known to it, even information gleaned from a trial in which the person to be sentenced was neither a defendant nor represented by counsel.”
• reviewing factual finding at sentencing for clear error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).