United States v. Gilbert R. Syverson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \a device can be a silencer for the purposes of § 921(a)(24) even if it does not actually silence\
• holding that a device was “intended only for use” in assembling or fabricating a silencer notwithstanding the designer’s stated intention that it be used as a muzzle brake
• upholding conviction for possession of parts designed to modify semi-automatic weapon to machine gun

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).