United States v. Gilbert G. Hamel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the Clean Water Act covers, at a minimum, those pollutants covered under the Refuse Act, which applies to “all foreign substances” not explicitly exempted from coverage
• holding that the CWA definition of “pollutant” covers gasoline discharges

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).