Skip to main content
· 10/2/2008

United States v. Giambro

Citations

  • 544 F.3d 26
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 20837
  • 2008 WL 4427630

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that \[t]he jury saw the weapon and therefore could reach its own determination of whether the characteristics were clear from simply looking at the [weapon]\
  • noting that “[t]he jury saw the weapon and therefore could reach its own determination of whether the characteristics were clear from simply looking at the [weapon]”
  • noting testimony that police detective recognized the weapon to be a firearm subject to federal regulation due to its short barrels “as soon as he saw it”
  • noting testimony that police detective recognized the weapon to be -11- a firearm subject to federal regulation due to its short barrels \as soon as he saw it\
  • court's holding on sufficiency of scienter evidence was based in part on defendant's heightened knowledge and interest in firearms
  • court’s holding on sufficiency of scienter evidence was based in part on defendant’s heightened knowledge and interest in firearms

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lynch, Boudin, Sehwarzer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.