United States v. Ghulam Sarwari

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “the jury is not permitted to guess as to the meaning the defendant ascribed to a question”
• explaining that the jury’s role is to “determine[] whether the defendant knew his statement was false”
• explaining that “the fact finder determines” how to interpret the language at issue and that “[a]n appellate court’s only role . . . is to assess the sufficiency of the evidence”
• involving the term “father” on a passport application

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).