United States v. Gerardo Bueno-Vargas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “signing a statement under penalty of perjury satisfies the standard for an oath or affirmation”
• explaining that “[w]hen an arrest has been made subject to a warrant, a judicial determination of probable cause has already been made as a prerequisite to obtaining the arrest warrant”
• “[S]igning a statement under penalty of perjury satisfies the standard for an oath or affirmation.”
• “signing a statement under penalty of perjury satisfies the standard for an oath or affirmation” required by the Fourth Amendment
• “Because [the declarant] gave the Statement under penalty of perjury, [he] knew that he was making a solemn promise ... that all the information he was providing was true and correct.”
• \An oath or affirmation protects the target of the search from impermissible state action by creating liability for perjury or false swearing for those who abuse the warrant process.\ (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).