United States v. Gerard J. Marinari

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that “after discharge, the jurors are quite properly free to discuss the case with whomever they choose”
• “Counsel risks waiver of [the party’s] right to a poll by merely waiting and watching as the jury disappears behind the closed door of the jury room.”
• poll can be conducted under federal rule “[ujrrtil the jury is actually discharged by separating or dispersing”
• “counsel’s decision not to interrupt the court when it was speaking is not to be held against him”
• “Until the jury is actually discharged by separating or dispersing[, ]not merely being declared discharged[], the verdict remains subject to review.”
• \counsel's decision not to interrupt the court when it was speaking is not to be held against him\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).