United States v. Gerald W. Sachsenmaier

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• confirming that Almendarez-Torres remains the governing law but noting that the defendant had preserved the argument for con- sideration by the Supreme Court
• noting that when Supreme Court precedent remains good law, a litigant may assert the argument in this court for the sole purpose of preserving it for Supreme Court review
• noting “this court’s many decisions holding that Almendarez-Torres is still good law after Booker’’
• finding a conspiracy where the defendant “took drug orders, arranged sales, collected drug money, No. 07-1494 9 and acted as an intermediary” between the seller and his customers
• noting “this court’s many decisions holding that Almendarez-Torres is still good law after Booker”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).