United States v. Gerald R. Caron

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that restoration of all of the rights which had been lost was sufficient
• noting that the First Circuit used to require a restoration of civil rights by “focused, individualized, affirmative action,” but now considers state “laws of general application” to determine whether rights have been restored
• finding a stop reasonable where “there [was] no evidence or even an allegation of less than diligent behavior on the part of the police”
• entrapment by estoppel argument waived because \[n]either th[e] motions nor the district court's Rulings and Memorandum of Decision nor the written plea agreement itself say anything about entrapment by estoppel\ [emphasis added]
• “Under California conflict of law rules, the parties may agree to what 5 law controls, unless the choice is contrary to a fundamental interest of a state with a materially 6 greater interest.”
• new records considered and collecting cases

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).