· 3/10/2006
United States v. Gerald L. Sidwell
Citations
- 440 F.3d 865
- 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 5957
- 2006 WL 568551
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that a controlled buy established probable cause that a residence contained drugs when a “confidential informant entered the building without contraband” and “exit[ed] moments later” with cocaine
- concluding that controlled buy supported probable cause even though informant could have obtained drugs from any person in one of several units in apartment building where defendant lived
- stating that “probable cause requires only a probability or a substantial chance that evidence may be found”
- “Generally, a controlled buy, when executed properly, is a reliable indicator as to the presence of illegal drug activity.”
- “[A] controlled buy, when executed properly, is a reliable indicator as to the presence of illegal drug activity.”(emphasis added)
- “Generally, a controlled buy, when executed properly, is a reliable indicator as to the presence of illegal drug activity.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ripple, Evans, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.