Skip to main content
· 3/10/2006

United States v. Gerald L. Sidwell

Citations

  • 440 F.3d 865
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 5957
  • 2006 WL 568551

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a controlled buy established probable cause that a residence contained drugs when a “confidential informant entered the building without contraband” and “exit[ed] moments later” with cocaine
  • concluding that controlled buy supported probable cause even though informant could have obtained drugs from any person in one of several units in apartment building where defendant lived
  • stating that “probable cause requires only a probability or a substantial chance that evidence may be found”
  • “Generally, a controlled buy, when executed properly, is a reliable indicator as to the presence of illegal drug activity.”
  • “[A] controlled buy, when executed properly, is a reliable indicator as to the presence of illegal drug activity.”(emphasis added)
  • “Generally, a controlled buy, when executed properly, is a reliable indicator as to the presence of illegal drug activity.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ripple, Evans, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.