United States v. Georgina Guerrero-Peralta

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the purpose of the writing requirement “is to provide the best record evidence of the express consent of a defendant” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• oral stipulation of counsel may satisfy Fed. R. Crim. P. 23(b) if record reflects that defendant’s personal express consent to the stipulation was intelligent and knowing
• record must indicate that defendant personally gave knowing, intelligent and express consent in open court to stipulation accepting jury of less than twelve
• the requirement of a writing is mandatory and unwaivable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).