Skip to main content
· 12/7/1984

United States v. George Tom Darby, Constantine Yamanis, Vincent Calise, and Michael Yamanis

Citations

  • 744 F.2d 1508

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • questioning viability of Toscanino exception and refusing to apply it absent allegations that defendant endured “cruel, inhuman and outrageous treatment”
  • applying three different tests, each looking to different aspects of the specific case, to determine reasonableness
  • holding one month of preparation for a complex criminal trial was sufficient
  • applying “literal construction” of section 3161(c)(2) in determining starting point for thirty day period in affirming district court’s denial of motion for continuance where counsel was changed
  • rejecting an interpretation of § 3161(c)(2) which “would enable defendants to postpone their prosecutions by simply changing lawyers or by retaining lawyers only for limited purposes prior to trial”
  • refusing to recognize an exception to the Ker-Fris-bie doctrine where the defendant alleged he was forcefully abducted, transported at gunpoint, and wrestled onto a plane bound for the United States

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kravitch, Hatchett, Morgan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.