· 12/7/1984
United States v. George Tom Darby, Constantine Yamanis, Vincent Calise, and Michael Yamanis
Citations
- 744 F.2d 1508
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- questioning viability of Toscanino exception and refusing to apply it absent allegations that defendant endured “cruel, inhuman and outrageous treatment”
- applying three different tests, each looking to different aspects of the specific case, to determine reasonableness
- holding one month of preparation for a complex criminal trial was sufficient
- applying “literal construction” of section 3161(c)(2) in determining starting point for thirty day period in affirming district court’s denial of motion for continuance where counsel was changed
- rejecting an interpretation of § 3161(c)(2) which “would enable defendants to postpone their prosecutions by simply changing lawyers or by retaining lawyers only for limited purposes prior to trial”
- refusing to recognize an exception to the Ker-Fris-bie doctrine where the defendant alleged he was forcefully abducted, transported at gunpoint, and wrestled onto a plane bound for the United States
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kravitch, Hatchett, Morgan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.