United States v. George Snow

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “an individual who consents to a search of his car should reasonably expect that readily-opened containers discovered inside the car will be opened and examined”
• holding that consent to search car included consent to search duffel bag found in back seat and bag jammed under seat
• holding that consent to search car included consent to search duffel bag found in back seat and bag jammed under seat
• holding that consent to search car included consent to search duffel bag found in back seat and bag jammed under seat
• holding that consent to search car included consent to search duffel bag found in back seat and bag jammed under seat
• allowing search of duffel bag inside vehicle in part because “no damage to the bags was required to gain access”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).