United States v. George Keith Williams, Jr., A/K/A Kevin Richardson United States of America v. George Keith Williams, Jr., A/K/A Kevin Richardson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that assaults occurring in hot pursuit fell “within the scope of the federal Bank Robbery Act”
• finding that jury could infer that presence of gun in car had “potential of facilitating” robbery and occurred “in relation to” robbery
• stating that “[t]he other courts of appeals that have considered whether escape is a part of the bank robbery also have determined that it is”
• discussing standards for using or carrying a firearm “during and in relation to” a drug-trafficking offense
• “Our case law has consistently treated escape as part and parcel of a bank robbery.”
• “Our case law has consistently treated escape as part and parcel of a bank robbery.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).