United States v. George Humberto Bosch, Sr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• appellant failed to show that testimony would not have been admissible if not elicited through leading questions
• testimony directed at whether defendant's activities helped the distribution, not defendant's guilt
• “In the absence of . . . a showing [that the evidence was not properly admissible], [counsel’s] failure to object to the admission of the . . . evidence was not unreasonable . . . .”
• “The conspiracy was complete when the conspirators had agreed to commit the offense and one of them had done an overt act in furtherance of the agreement. The accomplishment of the conspiracy’s goal is immaterial . . .”
• legal impossibility is no defense to conspiracy charge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).