· 10/20/1995
United States v. George H. Ruth
Citations
- 65 F.3d 599
- 1995 WL 527201
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that delay attributable to pro se motions, including defendant’s motion to discharge appointed counsel and represent himself, was excluded from 70‐day calculation
- rejecting defendant’s attempt to meet his burden of demonstrating a subjective expectation of privacy by relying solely on evidence submitted by the government
- “[W]ithout an affidavit or testimony from the defendant, it is almost impossible to find a privacy interest . . . .” (internal quotation marks omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cummings, Cudahy, Flaum
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.