Skip to main content
· 10/20/1995

United States v. George H. Ruth

Citations

  • 65 F.3d 599
  • 1995 WL 527201

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that delay attributable to pro se motions, including defendant’s motion to discharge appointed counsel and represent himself, was excluded from 70‐day calculation
  • rejecting defendant’s attempt to meet his burden of demonstrating a subjective expectation of privacy by relying solely on evidence submitted by the government
  • “[W]ithout an affidavit or testimony from the defendant, it is almost impossible to find a privacy interest . . . .” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cummings, Cudahy, Flaum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.