United States v. George Crisci

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “defendant’s knowing negotiation of a bank check bearing a forged endorsement satisfies th[e bank fraud intent] requirement”
• stating that bank fraud requires proof that defendant (1) engaged in conduct designed to deceive federal financial institution into releasing property,.and (2) possessed intent to victimize institution by exposing it to actual or potential loss
• affirming a district court’s application of the enhance- 3 ment because the defendant’s “separate count of conviction for making false statements to the FBI 4 agent investigating the instant offense compelled the district court to apply Section 3C1.1”
• “In this case, Crisci’s separate count of conviction for making false statements to the FBI agent investigating the instant offense compelled the district court to apply Section 3C1.1.”
• “The vice of a duplicitous charge is that it risks to impair a defendant’s rights to notice of the charge against him, to a unanimous verdict, to appropriate sentencing and to protection against double jeopardy in a subsequent prosecution.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).