United States v. George Christian Carr

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding statistical analysis insufficient to raise triable issue of fact 19 regarding pretext where statistical analysis fails to take relevant variables into consideration 20 (collecting cases)
• read-back of testimony was subsidiary matter because magistrate judge “was not required to interact or communicate with jury”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).