United States v. George C. Hook

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that since DNA blood draws are routine and incurs minimal pain and discomfort, they do not violate the Eighth Amendment
• holding that the DNA Act was not a bill of attainder
• holding DNA Act as amended by the Justice Act “punitive in neither purpose nor effect”
• making clear that perfunctory and undeveloped arguments and arguments 30 Nos. 08-1466, 08-1608, 08-1616 & 08-1617 unsupported by pertinent authority are waived
• applying special-needs test to the claim of a supervised releasee without mentioning Samson
• applying special-needs test to the claim of a supervised releasee without mentioning Samson

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).