United States v. George B. Waldron

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• fact that appellant was mistaken in his “assumptions and belief ... that the [painting was] authentic, stolen, and of great value” no defense to charge of conspiracy to “transport ... in ... foreign commerce goods worth at least $5,000, knowing the goods to have been stolen”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).