United States v. George B. Parr, Mary Elizabeth Ellis Saenz, Intervenor-Appellant, Clinton Manges, Surety, Movant-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating, in the context of the standard of review in bond forfeiture cases, \[i]t is clear that we cannot substitute our discretion for that of the district court\
• “The fact that [defendant] later died and the criminal proceeding against him abated does not constitute a defense to [surety] in the forfeiture proceeding.”
• “The fact that [defendant] later died and the criminal 11 proceeding against him abated does not constitute a defense to [surety] in the 12 forfeiture proceeding.”
• defendant's death while at liberty following affirmance of his conviction on appeal and following forfeiture of bond for failure to appear at bond revocation proceeding was not a defense available to the surety in the forfeiture proceeding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).