United States v. George A. Phillips, and Luke A. Finkelstein

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that defendant was not in custody because, inter alia, he “never requested a lawyer or to terminate the interview”
• explaining that the Court adopted an “objective, reasonable man standard” because “unlike a subjective test, it is not solely dependent either on the self- serving declarations of the police officers or the defendant”
• interview of suspect by police officers in station not custodial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).