United States v. Geo. E. Mallinson Importing Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that for harm- less error analysis “we consider the importance of the erro- neously admitted evidence to a party’s theory of the case”
• \[W]e have considered the significance of challenged evidence in light of the presence or absence of other 'overwhelming evidence' of a defendant's guilt.\
• evidence seized from a vehicle that linked the defendant to one of his prostitutes was cumulative to copious other evidence that the defendant was her pimp, and therefore the admission of the unlawfully seized evidence was harmless
• evidence seized from a vehicle that linked the defendant to one of his prostitutes was cumulative to copious other evidence that the defendant was her pimp, and therefore the admission of the unlawfully seized evidence was harmless
• erroneously admitted evi- dence that is cumulative is generally harmless

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).