United States v. Genin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the warrant affidavit contained some — albeit, insufficient — description of the allegedly pornographic videos
• noting that “a magistrate’s action cannot be a mere ratification of the bare conclusion of others nor a proverbial rubber stamp for conclusions drawn by the police” (internal quotation marks and citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).