United States v. General International Marketing Group

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that, especially where statute of limitations has expired, plaintiff must exert “such efforts at service as are consistent with a recognition that 120 days may otherwise mark the death of the action”
• finding no good cause in light of, inter alia, “the long period of time which [e]lapsed between the failure of mail service and the day when personal service was first attempted”
• finding no good cause in light of, inter alia, “the lack of any further attempt in the eleven days remaining” in the 120-day period, following a brief failed attempt by professional process server
• quoted with approval in United States v. World Commodities Equipment Corp., 32 CIT -, -, 2008 WL 748677 (2008)
• “a fair standard of good cause is one which requires people to show behavior consistent with the recognition that a 120-day deadline exists.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).