United States v. Gene M. Erekson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• relying on Serlin and finding that the officer “truthfully responded to [the defendant’s] inquiry into the nature of the investigation” and the defendant “did not become a focus of the investigation until two months after the interview”
• relying on Serlin and finding that the officer “truth- folly responded to [the defendant’s] inquiry into the nature of the investigation” and the defendant “did not become a focus of the investigation until two months after the interview”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).