United States v. Gaytan-Garza

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the time limit for filing a criminal appeal is not jurisdictional
• finding sua sponte dismissal “appropriate here, as Gaytan-Garza’s delay of over four years in filing his appeal implicates the important judicial interests of finality of convictions and efficient administration of claim processing”
• sua sponte dismissing untimely appeal because, while defect was non-jurisdictional, dismissal was “appropriate” where notice of appeal was “over four years late”
• dismissing four-year old appeal sua sponte

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).