United States v. Gaylord James Miguel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• distinguishing Connell and holding that a single warning that defendant “may” have appointed counsel, with no prior state- ment that defendant had to make his own arrangements, was an adequate Miranda warning
• evidence sufficient to find defendant guilty of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute marijuana where defendant went with his father into the desert in the middle of the night, stood by while the marijuana was loaded into a truck, and ran from the Border Patrol

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).