United States v. Gaya

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \there is no reason to exempt 'structural errors' \ from the invited-error doctrine
• emphasizing that the defendant “had ample opportunity during the previous five months to express to the court his dissatisfaction with his lawyer and desire for a different one”
• emphasizing that the defendant “had ample opportunity during the previous five months to express to the court his dissatisfaction with his lawyer and desire for a different one”
• explaining that \there is no reason to exempt 'structural errors' \ from waiver
• holding there is “no reason to exempt ‘structural errors’” from the invited error doctrine
• explaining that “there is no reason to exempt ‘structural errors’” from waiver

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).