Skip to main content
· 7/19/2005

United States v. Gary William Holt

Citations

  • 417 F.3d 1172
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 14519
  • 2005 WL 1667517

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining AEDPA’s restrictions on second or successive petitions and concluding “[w]ithout authorization, the district court lacks jurisdiction to consider a second or successive petition’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tjoflat, Birch, Dubina

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.