United States v. Gary Stewart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that D.C. Superior Court judges are “Article I . . . judges, whom Congress intended to be analogous to state court judges” and holding that a federal statute “authorized [them] to act as federal committing magistrates”
• “In the absence of a proffer of what counsel expected to establish from the [expert] testimony ... we find no abuse of discretion by the district court in curtailing further cross examination on this subject”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).