United States v. Gary Senn, Joseph L. Marino, Nathan Thomas Cannon, Alfred Destefano, and John Weaver

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that impermissible double counting occurs “if the offense itself necessarily includes the same conduct as the enhancement”
• holding that failure to use all potential impeaching material does not always affect the outcome of trial
• holding that impermissible double counting occurs “if the offense itself necessarily includes the same conduct as the enhancement”
• holding that pilot enhancement does not require \proof of special skill\
• finding that a guilty plea entered only three days before the scheduled start of a narcotics trial was untimely and that any disagreement as to the amount of narcotics possessed by the defendant should not have delayed the plea
• rejecting a double counting challenge to the captain/navigator smuggler adjustment because the “bar on double counting comes into play only if the offense itself necessarily includes the same conduct as the [adjustment]” (emphasis in original)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).