United States v. Gary Nelson Johnson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Puerto Rico had standing in Snapp because the discrimination “impaired [Puerto Rico’s] participation in federal employment programs.
• noting that Puerto Rico had standing in Snapp because the discrimination “impaired [Puerto Rico’s] participation in federal employment programs.
• holding the domestic relations exception \is applied only as a judicially implied limitation on the diversity jurisdiction; it has no generally recognized application as a limitation on federal question jurisdiction\
• noting that the Tenth Amendment requires a showing that a federal statute or regulation is beyond Congress’ power or that the “means of regulation employed ... impermissibly infringes upon state sovereignty”
• noting that the Tenth Amendment requires a showing that a federal statute or regulation is beyond Congress’ power or that the “means of regulation employed . . . impermissibly infringes upon state sovereignty”
• describing elements of CSRA offense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).