United States v. Gary K. Burke

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “bootstrapping” testimony related to extrinsic acts is admissible but only to the extent it is relevant to a material fact
• erroneous admission of extrinsic acts was harmless because there was strong properly admitted evidence of guilt and prosecutor did not “embellish upon the incident”
• although “[t]here was a violation of the local Bankruptcy Rules[,]” insofar as the debtors had a 27 “meaningful opportunity” to be heard and the bankruptcy court “thoroughly considered” the debtors’ arguments, there was no 28 (continued...
• although “[t]here was a violation of the local Bankruptcy Rules[,]” insofar as the debtors had a 27 “meaningful opportunity” to be heard and the bankruptcy court “thoroughly considered” the debtors’ arguments, there was no 28 (continued...

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).