Ninth Circuit· 1/6/2021

United States v. Gary Henry

Citations

984 F.3d 1343

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that conviction under Pinkerton theory could serve as predicate § 924(c) crime of violence because “[d]efendants found guilty . . . under either a Pinkerton or aiding-and-abetting theory are treated as if they committed the offense as principals”
explaining that because “[d]efendants found guilty of armed bank robbery under either a Pinkerton or aiding-and-abetting theory are treated as if they committed the offense as principals,” “Davis does 14 not conflict with or undermine the cases upholding § 924(c
rejecting argument that § 924(c) conviction was invalid if predicate offense was based on Pinkerton liability
rejecting argument that § 924(c) conviction was invalid if predicate offense was based on Pinkerton liability
upholding a 315-day delay as reasonable due, in part, to the complexity of the case even though the defendant was in pretrial detention
aiding and abetting armed bank robbery is a crime of violence under § 924(c)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.