United States v. Gary D. Hatcher

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The NHSC repeatedly offered Hatcher amnesty if he would agree to fulfil his obligation, but he refused each time”
• in 23 Richmond, “the Court decided litigants may not use the doctrine of estoppel offensively, to support 24 ‘a claim for payment of money from the Public Treasury contrary to a statutory appropriation’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).