United States v. Gary C. Quilling

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “ ‘prejudice re- quiring severance is not shown if evidence on the sev- ered counts would be admissible in the trial of the re- maining counts’ ”
• “[A] [d]efendant’s mere presence in a dwelling where a prohibited item was found, without more, is not suffi- cient to establish constructive possession.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).