United States v. Gary Bowley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, absent egregious circumstances, the Fourth Amendment does not provide an alien the means to suppress his immigration file or information therein
• applying Lopez-Mendoza in deciding that identity evidence was not suppressible in a criminal prosecution, because “we doubt that the Court lightly used such a sweeping word as ‘never’ in deciding when identity may be suppressed as the fruit of an illegal search o[r] arrest”
• interpreting Lopez-Mendoza as barring suppression of evidence of iden- tity
• interpreting Lopez- Mendoza as barring suppression of evidence of identity
• interpreting Lopez-Mendoza as barring suppression of evidence of identity
• interpreting Lopez-Mendoza as barring suppression of evidence of identity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).