Skip to main content
· 12/24/1981

United States v. Gary Barrett Green

Citations

  • 670 F.2d 1148
  • 216 U.S. App. D.C. 329
  • 9 Fed. R. Serv. 801
  • 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 14926

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that “the Government has a qualified privilege during a suppression hearing not to disclose its surveillance locations”
  • noting that “the suppression hearing is a critical stage of the prosecution which affects substantial rights of an accused person; the outcome of the hearing-the suppression vel non of evidence-may often determine the eventual outcome of conviction or acquittal”
  • finding a suppression hearing to be \a critical stage of the prosecution which affects substantial rights of an accused person . . . [that] may often determine the eventual outcome of conviction or acquittal\
  • finding a suppression hearing to be \a critical stage of the prosecution which affects substantial rights of an accused person . . . [that] may often determine the eventual outcome of conviction or acquittal\
  • street corner exchange of money for object from a paper bag in neighborhood “notorious” for narcotics trafficking
  • probable cause found where three people were exchanging items on the street and their movements suggested an attempt to conceal the object of their transaction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tamm, Wilkey, Edwards

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.