· 12/24/1981
United States v. Gary Barrett Green
Citations
- 670 F.2d 1148
- 216 U.S. App. D.C. 329
- 9 Fed. R. Serv. 801
- 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 14926
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that “the Government has a qualified privilege during a suppression hearing not to disclose its surveillance locations”
- noting that “the suppression hearing is a critical stage of the prosecution which affects substantial rights of an accused person; the outcome of the hearing-the suppression vel non of evidence-may often determine the eventual outcome of conviction or acquittal”
- finding a suppression hearing to be \a critical stage of the prosecution which affects substantial rights of an accused person . . . [that] may often determine the eventual outcome of conviction or acquittal\
- finding a suppression hearing to be \a critical stage of the prosecution which affects substantial rights of an accused person . . . [that] may often determine the eventual outcome of conviction or acquittal\
- street corner exchange of money for object from a paper bag in neighborhood “notorious” for narcotics trafficking
- probable cause found where three people were exchanging items on the street and their movements suggested an attempt to conceal the object of their transaction
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tamm, Wilkey, Edwards
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.