Skip to main content

United States v. Garvin

Citations

  • 26 M.J. 194
  • 1988 CMA LEXIS 1122
  • 1988 WL 55242

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “the mistaken delivery of a discharge certificate . . . was not accomplished with the intent required to effect a valid discharge”
  • where discharge authority revoked discharge orders prior to delivery \the mistaken delivery of [the] discharge certificate ... was not accomplished with the intent required to effect a valid discharge\
  • ''[T]he orders directing appellant’s discharge were rescinded by the commander who issued them in the first instance. Accordingly, it was not an authorized discharge within the meaning of Article 2.”
  • discharge void, barred by statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cox, Everett, Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named United States v. Garvin

7 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.