United States v. Garry R. Benish

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the District Court lacked discretion to depart downward based on the age and sex of marijuana plants, which made them “possibly weak”
• concluding granting a motion to stay 5 discovery pending a motion to dismiss is within the Court’s discretion
• district court would have abused its discretion in staying discovery if 24 the discovery was necessary to decide the dispositive motion
• district court would have abused its discretion in staying discovery if the discovery 4 was necessary to decide the dispositive motion
• district court would have abused its discretion in staying discovery if 10 the discovery was necessary to decide the dispositive motion
• district court would have abused its discretion in staying discovery if 27 the discovery was relevant to whether or not the court had subject matter jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).