Skip to main content
· 10/19/1990

United States v. Garry David Gallardo

Citations

  • 915 F.2d 149
  • 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 18297
  • 1990 WL 143618

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • construing post-judgment objection to the magistrate judge’s report as a Rule 59(e) motion
  • analogizing the statute prohibiting the mailing of child pornography with the mail fraud statute, concluding that mailing four separate letters constituted four separate violations even though three of the envelopes were mailed at the same time
  • construing objections to the report, filed in a criminal case after entry of the final judgment, as a motion for reconsideration that tolled the time for filing a notice of appeal until after entry of the court’s order disposing of the motion
  • liberally construing objections as a motion for reconsideration in the context of the former 10-day time limit for filing a Rule 59(e) motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gee, Per Curiam, Smith, Wiener

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.