Skip to main content
· 1/7/2000

United States v. Garnett L. Tuttle and Larry Settle

Citations

  • 200 F.3d 892
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 126
  • 2000 WL 6148

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that tip was not stale when only a week passed between an informant’s report of ongoing criminal activity and the issuance of a search warrant
  • noting that “information received from an informant whose reliability is not established may be sufficient to create probable cause when there is some independent corroboration by the police of the informant’s information”
  • noting that \information received from an informant whose reliability is not established may be sufficient to create probable cause when there is some independent corroboration by the police of the informant's information\
  • noting that \information received from an informant whose reliability is not established may be sufficient to create probable cause when there is some independent corroboration by the police of the informant's information\
  • noting that “information received from an informant whose reliability is not established may be sufficient to create probable cause when there is some independent corroboration by the police of the informant’s information”
  • “[I]nformation received from an informant whose reliability is not established may be sufficient to create probable cause where there is some independent corroboration by police of the informant’s information.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Merritt, Siler, Beckwith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.