United States v. Gardzielewski

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that extra commissions on the sale of particular securities products represent a “conflict of interest” that is “material”
• holding that the brokers satisfied their disclosure obligations because of “general disclosures” in fund prospectuses and “Statements of Additional Information” filed with the SEC by the managers of the money market funds
• “We are bound by the SEC’s interpretations of its regulations in its amicus brief, unless they are plainly erroneous or inconsistent with the regulation[s]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).