United States v. Garcia-Dominguez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff's complaint was time-barred where her initial complaint was treated as if it \had never been filed\ after the district court dismissed the initial complaint without prejudice
• holding that four-year statute of limitations applies to FCRA claims
• holding that four-year statute of limitations applies to FCRA claims
• explaining that the district court dismissed the complaint with leave to amend, then subsequently dismissed the “complaint” when plaintiff failed to amend; the latter “placed the parties in a position as if the suit had never been filed.”
• finding plaintiff not entitled to equitable tolling though the statute of limitations passed
• finding plaintiff not entitled to equitable tolling though the statute of limitations passed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).