United States v. Gambize Schardar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the prosecutor’s comment during closing argument that while the government bore the burden of proof, both the government and the defense had subpoena powers was not improper
• “ Goods have been adjudged to have moved in interstate . . . commerce when they are in the course of such a crossing, even when they have not yet crossed the technical bound­ aries.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).