United States v. Gambino, Rosario, Erasmo Gambino, Antonio Gambino, and Anthony Spatola

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that evidence of trafficking cocaine was relevant for determining whether the defendant was predisposed to distribute heroin
• stating that evidence of trafficking cocaine was relevant for determining whether the defendant was predisposed to distribute heroin
• noting that the Cronic analysis should be used for \particularly egregious circumstances\
• government may prove propensity by showing, inter alia, an existing course of criminal conduct similar to the crime for which the defendant is charged
• “A decision on a motion to set aside a default is not an abuse of discretion unless the [district] court is 'clearly wrong’ in its determination....”
• Zepp lent itself to one conclusion: counsel labored under an actual conflict of interest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).