United States v. GALINDO

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that with the 1900 Act “the reservation was dissolved and tribal government broken up”
• noting that with the 1900 Act “the reservation was dissolved and tribal government broken up”
• explaining that “[t]he allotment of lands in severalty within the limits of [an] established reservation” would not, standing alone, disestablish the reservation or “exclude the allotments from [the reservation of which they were a part]”
• explaining that “[t]he allotment of lands in severalty within the limits of [an] established reservation” would not, standing alone, disestablish the reservation or “exclude the allotments from [the reservation of which they were a part]”
• reading the GCA’s predecessor statute to mean “the general laws of the United States as to the punishment of crimes committed any place within the sole and exclusive jurisdiction of the United States w[ere] extended to ‘Indian Country’”
• discussing statute as example of language “disestablishing] the organized reservation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).